Neumann
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
This military pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiffs opposition thereto. The parties have ably and thoroughly briefed the case. Plaintiff also requested the opportunity to present oral argument. After carefully reviewing the briefs and exhibits presented, we find oral argument unnecessary and we grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff, a dentist by profession, was a Major in the United States Air Force with 14 years and 29 days of active military service completed on November 30,1963, at which time he was involuntarily separated from the Air Force…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Gersten v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Albert H. Grisham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- BenderUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crispino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Associated Hospital Services, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Park v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Caravella v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Quirk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.