Gersten v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
William F. Oberkoetter, the plaintiff’s decedent,1 was separated in 1954, as a result of a reduction in force, from his civilian position as an auditor with the Chicago Ordnance District. The claim is that this separation was improper because, first, it stemmed directly from a previous illegal demotion and reassignment, and, second, the employee was not given the true reason for the reduction in force. The various steps taken by the agency and the Civil Service Commission with respect to the demotion, reassignment, and separation are set forth in the findings. We do not narrate or appraise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Elchibegoff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- Chappelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Levy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Mallow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Albert H. Grisham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.