Legal Opinion

Quirk v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 29, 1981No. 215-80CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant has moved without opposition for summary judgment and an order dismissing this petition on the *781grounds that there exists no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant submits several theories to obtain this result, but we find defendant is clearly entitled to summary judgment because the claim is barred by the doctrine of laches. We therefore dismiss the petition without oral argument.

Plaintiff Quirk is a former enlisted member of the United States Navy. During his naval service, plaintiff had a history of medical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Robert I. Powell v. Eugene M. ZuckertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  5. Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huffaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Stone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Goeppner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Hogle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API