Legal Opinion

Park v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 16, 1986No. 203-86CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This military pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The issue is whether plaintiff’s action should be barred by the doctrine of laches.

FACTS

Plaintiff served in the United States Army (the “Army”) for approximately four years before being released from duty at the rank of first lieutenant on April 30, 1981. Plaintiff was selécted for promotion to captain on May 22, 1980, but after an informal investigation revealed allegations of homosexual acts on her part, her promotion did not take place. The Army further reacted to these…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Levi Strauss & Co., Applicant/appellant v. Genesco, Inc., Opposer/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Long v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Muse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API