Legal Opinion
Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 7, 1995No. Civ. 95-20368 SWPublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. (“Lockheed”) brought this action against Hughes Aircraft Company and GM Hughes Electronics (collectively, “Hughes”), alleging that Hughes refused to honor a promise to supply Lockheed with a component that Lockheed needs to bid on a missile warning system contract for the United States government. Lockheed has applied for a temporary restraining order. For the reasons expressed below, Lockheed’s application is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
In 1984, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Luis Martinez v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- 21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 990, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,594 Ina P. Anderson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Laks v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. Royal Plush Toys, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Bronco Wine Co. v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
- Frontline Medical Associates, Inc. v. Coventry Healthcare Workers Compensation, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Brown Jordan International, Inc. v. Mind's Eye Interiors, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- Garrett v. City of EscondidoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.