Legal Opinion
Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1987No. 86-6098PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are pilots employed by Continental Air Lines who have been active in their union, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA). This suit arose out of ALPA's bitter strike against Continental, which began in October 1983 and continued for two years. After the strike ended, plaintiffs sought an injunction to bar Continental from requiring them to take polygraph tests as a condition of their continued employment or reinstatement. They contend that the polygraph requirement is retaliation for protected, concerted union activity under section 2 (Fourth) of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-Op Cecil A. Schell Edward Sewall Marvin KleynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.