Legal Opinion
Bronco Wine Co. v. United States Department of Treasury
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 24, 1996No. CV-F-96-6354-REC/DLBPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S • MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
COYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bronco Wine Company (“Bronco” or “Plaintiff”) moves for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to prevent the United States Department of Treasury, Bureau of Acohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“BATF” or “the Agency”) from restricting the sale and distribution of its wines across the nation. Plaintiff argues that without a TRO, it will suffer irreparable and substantial injury, and that eventually, its underlying challenge is likely to succeed on the merits. Upon due consideration of the oral and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Tapeprinter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Erard v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Sociedad Anonima Viña Santa Rita v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Bronco Wine Co. v. JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Wahba, LLC v. Usrp (Don), LLCHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.