Legal Opinion

Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. Royal Plush Toys, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 6, 2012No. Case No. C 12-5543 SBAPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

On October 29, 2012, Rovio Entertainment Ltd fka Rovio Mobile Oy (“Plaintiff’) brought the instant copyright and trademark infringement action against Defendants Royal Plush Toys, Inc. (“RPI”), Western Sales and Services Inc. (‘WS & S”), Royal Trade Int’l Inc. (“RTI”), and Jong K. Park (“Park”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Before the Court is Plaintiffs ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), an order to show cause (“OSC”) why a prehminary injunction should not issue, a seizure order, a substitute custodian order, and an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. (HC) Ballard v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (HC) Singh v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (HC) Smith v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (HC) Valdez Mendez v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (HC) Winston v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API