Legal Opinion

Garrett v. City of Escondido

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 20, 2006No. CIV. 06CV2434JAHNLSPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

HOUSTON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Now before this Court is Plaintiffs Roy Garrett, Mary Garrett and Escondido Human Rights Committee’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to restrain Defendant City of Escondido (“Defendant”) from implementing and/or enforcing Ordinance No.2006-38 R, Chapter 16E of the Escondido Municipal Code. Doc. No. 3. Oral argument was heard on November 16, 2006, with appearances by Phillip Tencer, Alan Mansfield, and David Blair-Loy for Plaintiffs, and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Lozano v. City of HazletonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. ARIZONA CONTRACTORS ASS'N INC. v. CandelariaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers BranchDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Keller v. City of FremontDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API