Legal Opinion

City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 2012No. A11-705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant-condemnor City of Moorhead (city) acquired the right to provide utility service to an area within the service territory of respondent Red River Valley Cooperative Power Association (Red River). On appeal from the award of damages to Red River, the city argues that (1) the district court misapplied Minn.Stat. § 216B.47 when it determined that the statute’s reference to four non-fair-market-value factors for calculating damages precludes consideration of fair market value and, as a result, the jury instructions regarding damages erroneously excluded consideration…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API