Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
This action arises from a workplace dispute between appellant LeRoy Bahr and respondent Stacy Rasmussen. Bahr and Rasmussen are both employed by respondent Boise Cascade Corporation (Boise). As a result of statements Rasmussen made in the workplace, Bahr filed a defamation action against Rasmussen, Boise, and Eural Dobbs, Bahr’s supervisor at Boise. The district court denied respondents’ motion for summary judgment and the matter proceeded to trial. The jury found in favor of Bahr and against Rasmussen and Boise. 1 The district court had denied respondents’ motions for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Dave Thomas v. United Steelworkers Local 1938Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Magee v. Trustees of Hamline UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Jeffrey Sherman v. Rinchem Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.