State v. Riggs
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a restitution order, appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court abused its discretion when it apportioned some of the fault for the victim’s injuries to the victim and reduced the amount of restitution because the victim was the aggressor in the fight in which he was injured. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
At a gas station, D.S. confronted respondent Brandon Riggs about the quality of some marijuana that respondent had sold him and/or about money that respondent owed him. D.S; wanted to fight respondent, but respondent got into his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Northland Country Club v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015