Legal Opinion
City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 2013No. A11-0705PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
We are presented here with issues arising out of the expansion of the City of Moorhead and the decision of the City to provide municipal electrical service to recently annexed territory. The City annexed Americana Estates, a residential subdivision with 65 metered electric service accounts. The City then filed a condemnation petition to begin municipal electric service to residents of Americana Estates under Minn.Stat. § 216B.47 (2012). The Red River Valley Cooperative Power Association (RRVC), which previously served Americana Estates, did not dispute the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- City of Duluth v. 120 East Superior Street, Duluth, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.