Hill v. Jacobs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent predicated upon the trial court’s granting respondent’s amended petition to terminate a joint tenancy to certain real property situated in the county of Los Angeles, state of California.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent (Ah Gett v. Carr, 3 Cal. App. 47, 48 [84 Pac. 458]), the facts in the instant ease are:
Respondent’s testator, Sidney A. Hill, and appellant’s testatrix, Hattie F. Hill, were husband and wife. There was deeded to Mrs. Hill as her separate property a certain parcel of real estate located…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Taylor v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Munfrey v. ClearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Aitkenhead v. WillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Helbing v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cline v. FestersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- MacAulay v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.