Taylor v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Alfred Sutro, and Felix T. Smith, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The will of Michael Martin was offered for probate by the Savings Union Bank and Trust Company, a corporation, named in the will as executor thereof. A contest over the admission to probate of this will was instituted by the three adult children of the deceased,—two married daughters, Ellen Taylor and Ann Lowney, and one unmarried son, Frank H. Martin. The contest was heard and determined before a jury. The sole ground of contest presented to the jury’s consideration was that of the unsoundness of mind of the testator. The jury’s verdict declared the will to be the product of an unsound mind.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Estate of PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Galbraith v. PaniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.