Legal Opinion

Aitkenhead v. Wills

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1947No. Civ. 15551PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

On the morning of March 2, 1944, decedent Maude R. Rich, then 66 years of age, executed an holographic will by the terms of which her entire estate was bequeathed to Mrs. Clara Wills, who had been legally adopted when she was seven years of age, by decedent’s mother. This holographic will was placed by decedent in her safety deposit box at the Bank of America at San Pedro, California, at 10 o’clock on the morning of the same day it was executed. Shortly thereafter the testatrix boarded a train at San Pedro, bound for Los Angeles, where at about noon of the same day she committed suicide by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Estate of GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Battle v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Holliday v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API