Legal Opinion

Thatch v. Livingston

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1936No. Civ. 10132PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury.

The conceded facts are:

July 29,1931, plaintiff, the grandmother of defendant Ruth Livingston, loaned to defendants the sum of $2,400 secured by a note and trust deed executed by defendants and naming plaintiff and defendant Ruth Livingston as the payees of the note and beneficiaries under the trust deed. Plaintiff filed this action to quiet title to the promissory note and trust deed, alleging that defendants misrepresented certain facts at the time of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. McNairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Sieroty v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wolfson v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API