Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Packard Motor Car Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1946No. 10157PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued in a proceeding charging unfair labor practices against the respondent, the Packard Motor Car Company. On December 6, 1945, the Board determined that Packard’s “general foremen, foremen, assistant foremen and special assignment men” employed at the company’s plants in Detroit, Michigan, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of section 9(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159(b). Pursuant to this order an election was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 641Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell Aerospace Company Division of Textron Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- BD. OF ED. OF WEST ORANGE v. WiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.