Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
These appeals challenge the validity of the Labor Relations Act of the State of New York as applied to appellants to permit unionization of their foremen. Conflict is asserted between it and the National Labor Relations Act and hence with the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
After enactment by Congress of the National Labor Relations Act, July 5, 1935, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U. S. C. § 151, et seq., New York adopted a State Labor Relations Act following the federal pattern. Laws of New York, 1937, Chap. 443, 30 McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of New York, §§ 700-716. In the administrative boards…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by333 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.