Legal Opinion
Kubish v. Zega
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 6, 2001No. AC 19697PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Mary Kubish and Stephen Kubish, appeal from the judgment of the trial court ordering a partition of three parcels of real property among the plaintiffs and the defendants, Buzziena Zega, Helen Kubish and Josephine Kubish,1 all of whom pre*610viously owned the property as tenants in common. The defendants cross appeal from that part of the judgment ordering them to pay $2500 to the plaintiffs to equalize the differing values of the properties distributed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Rosenblit v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. MaturoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Keller v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Cadle Co. v. D'ADDARIOConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.