Legal Opinion
Rosenblit v. Williams
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 23, 2000No. AC 18980PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The plaintiff, Jack L. Rosenblit, trustee, appeals from the trial court’s determination of priorities in a judgment of strict foreclosure. The court determined, on principles of equitable subrogation, that a mortgage held by the defendant Ford Consumer Finance Company, Inc. (Ford), that was subsequent to certain mortgages held by the plaintiff should be given priority over the plaintiffs mortgages. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) applied the doctrine of equitable subrogation and (2) subrogated his mortgages to the entire balance of Ford’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. HovhannissianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- 1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. FohlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. TaltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.