Legal Opinion
New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. Maturo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 17, 2007No. AC 27382PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The law is well settled that a commercial real estate broker who finds a lessee ready, willing and able to lease the subject premises on the owner’s terms is entitled to a commission pursuant to the provisions of the valid listing agreement. See, e.g., Goldblatt Associates v. Panza, 24 Conn. App. 250, 252, 587 A.2d 433 (1991). In this appeal, the defendant, Mildred Maturo, executrix of the estate of Joseph P. Maturo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, New England Retail Properties, Inc., requiring payment of its commission. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- R. F. Daddario & Sons, Inc. v. ShelanskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Mastroianni v. Fairfield County Paving, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- BRAFFMAN v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Braffman v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.