Legal Opinion

Lang v. Oppenheim

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1884No. 10,384PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The parties to this action had beep partners, and after the dissolution of the firm the appellee brought this suit to recover a balance alleged to be due him from the partnership-affairs.

A demurrer was overruled to the first, second and third paragraphs of the complaint; issues were formed, a trial had and a judgment rendered for $2,918.24. A motion to strike out the judgment and allow the finding to remain as a balance due until a final accounting was overruled and a receiver was appointed to close the affairs of the firm.

These rulings are assigned as error.

The third paragraph of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cobble v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Page v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Crossley v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Evansville, Cairo & Memphis Steam Packet Co. v. WildmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Douthit v. DouthitIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API