Legal Opinion

Crossley v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9766PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellees’ com¡plaint alleges that on the 3d day of January, 1878, the appellant and Joseph O. Hardy jointly executed their note to Theodore Hileman, administrator, for $400; that the note was executed for wheat purchased and received, “jointly and in partnership,” and that each of the makers was bound to pay •the one-half thereof; that Hardy paid all of the said note, and afterwards assigned his claim to appellees’ intestate.

The appellant correctly contends that this paragraph is bad, for the reason that it shows that he and Hardy were partners, •and does not show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Lawrence v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
  3. Over v. HetheringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hasselman v. DouglassIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Douthit v. DouthitIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Lang v. OppenheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. McDonald v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API