Legal Opinion

Douthit v. Douthit

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1892No. 15,805PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

There is a single assignment of errors comprising several specifications, in which all of the appellants join. The rule is that, although there are separate specifications of error,-the assignment must be good as to all who j oin in it, or it will not be available to any of the appellants. This is the well-settled rule. See authorities, cited in Elliott’s Appellate Procedure, §§318, 401, 299, notes. Under this familiar rule we can not consider the rulings upon the demurrers to the complaint, since it undoubtedly states a cause of action against some of the appellants, and shows that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Anderson v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Coleman v. ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Carvey v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Parish v. CamplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API