Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Lowe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1887No. 12,570PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This suit was to recover the amount of a promissory note, bearing date May 11th, 1874, calling for eight hundred dollars, and interest, executed by W. W. Lowe & Co., and payable to O. M. Thompson. At the time the note was executed the firm of W. W. Lowe & Co. was composed of William W. Lowe, Oliver M. Thompson and Daniel M. Lovett. The payee of the note was one of the partners. After the execution of the note, Lovett transferred his interest in the partnership assets to Lowe & Thompson, the .latter assuming all the partnership debts. Subsequently, Lowe & Thompson dissolved partnership, Lowe…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Over v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Epperson v. HostetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Coleman v. ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Valentine v. WysorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Boonville National Bank v. BlakeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Douthit v. DouthitIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lord v. . HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API