Legal Opinion

Baker v. Pyatt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1886No. 11,216PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee brought this action to have his deed corrected, and his title to the lands described in the complaint quieted, as against all claims by appellant. The deed was made to appellee by his and appellant’s father, a short, time before his death, and it is claimed that by mistake the land intended to be conveyed is not described in the deed,, but other land which the father did not own.

The first paragraph of the complaint asks for a quieting of' the title, and the second for a reformation of the deed. There-is a third paragraph in the complaint, but it is apparent that the finding and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Sohn v. CambernIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. City of Logansport v. LaRoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Gary D. Kent John David Kent and Kevin Kent, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Gary D. Kent Nicholas Kent and David Kent v. Cynthia KerrIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API