Legal Opinion

Goosby v. Town Board of Hempstead

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 25, 1999No. Docket No. 97-7403PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants the Town Board of the Town of Hempstead, New York (the “Board” or “Town Board”), and Gregory P. Peterson, Richard V. Guardino, Patrick A. Zagarino, Curtis Fisher, Joseph Ra, Anthony Santino and Joseph Kearney, in their official capacities as members of the Town Board,1 appeal from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, J.), following a bench trial, enjoining the Town of Hempstead from the use of an at-large voting method to elect members of the Town Board. The court determined that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bush v. VeraSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Nipper v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shirt v. HazeltineDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
  2. United States v. Village of Port ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Association v. County of AlbanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  4. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of AlbanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Thompson v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API