Voinovich v. Quilter
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
This is yet another dispute arising out of legislative redistricting and reapportionment. See, e. g., Growe v. Emison, ante, p. 25. Today we consider whether Ohio’s creation of several legislative districts dominated by minority voters violated §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973.
I
Under the Ohio Constitution, the state apportionment board must reapportion electoral districts for the state legislature every 10 years. Ohio Const., Art. XI, § 1. In 1991, the board selected James Tilling to draft a proposed apportionment plan. After conducting public…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Katzenbach v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by375 opinions
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
370 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.