Legal Opinion

United States v. Village of Port Chester

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 1, 2010No. 06 Civ. 15173(SCR)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STEPHEN C. ROBINSON, District Judge.

On January 17, 2008, the Court found that Plaintiffs had demonstrated that the Village of Port Chester’s at-large voting system for electing its Board of Trustees violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. After careful consideration of the parties’ proposed remedial plans, the Court issued a summary order on November 6, 2009 concluding that Defendant, the Village, had proposed a legally acceptable remedy and ordered the implementation of at-large elections with cumulative voting. In furtherance of the implementation, the parties…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Large v. Fremont County, Wyo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Missouri State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Ferguson-Florissant School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  4. Perez v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
  5. Wilson v. FallinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API