Legal Opinion

Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & Loveless

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2012No. 20100595PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{ 1 The plaintiffs in this case brought suit against a law firm and its attorneys for their role in executing civil discovery orders. The orders authorized entry into plaintiffs' home to seize electronic files from plaintiffs' computer and other electronic devices. The plaintiffs raised several causes of action against the law firm and its attorneys, largely based on the theory that the execution of the civil discovery orders constituted an illegal warrantless search.

T2 The district court granted the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Scott v. Universal Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Madsen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Fire Ins Exchange v. OltmannsUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Cincinnati Insurance v. AMSCO WindowsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API