Fire Ins Exchange v. Oltmanns
Utah Supreme Court
Justice Durham filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the result.
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Himonas, amended opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶1 Robert Oltmanns was named as a defendant in a personal injury case. He filed a claim with his insurer, Fire Insurance Exchange, who questioned whether the claim was covered under the policy. Rather than deny the claim outright, Fire Insurance brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether the claim was covered under Mr. Oltmanns's policy. The court of appeals ultimately held that it was covered, and Mr. Oltmanns filed a counterclaim seeking attorney fees for the declaratory judgment action, arguing that it was brought in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dan Wilson v. Safelite Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
- Becker v. Sunset CityUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- M.A. v. Regence BlueCrossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Northern Monticello Alliance v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.