Scott v. Universal Sales, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
Introduction
11 This case requires us to consider the conditions under which the custodian of a dangerous person has a duty to prevent that person from injuring others. In prior cases, we have concluded that such a duty exists only if the custodian is aware, or should be aware, that the person poses a threat to a specific individual or a discrete group of individuals. In contrast, the Second Restatement of Torts does not require notice of the same particularized danger, and the Plaintiff in this case urges us to overrule our prior caselaw in favor of…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bank of America v. AdamsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Salo v. TylerUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Pinder v. DuchesneUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Colosimo v. Gateway Cmty. ChurchUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Bylsma v. R.C.WilleyHumanTouchUtah Supreme Court · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.