Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. AMSCO Windows
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 5, 2013No. Civil No. 2:10-CV-00542 BSJPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
(Fed.R.Civ.P. 56)
BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge.
On June 10, 2010, plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that Cincinnati has no duty to defend or indemnify AMSCO under the terms of its commercial general liability insurance policies and commercial umbrella liability policies with respect to “any claims in the Third Party Complaints filed by J & L Windows, Inc. (‘J & L’) and other various claimants ... against AM-SCO, in any and all actions arising out of or related to construction of homes…
2Cases cited136 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Ctr. for Excellence in Higher Educ., Inc. v. Rsui Indem. Co.District Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ma'AfuCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Acuity, a Mutual Insurance Co. v. McGinnis Homes, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.