Legal Opinion

Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2005No. 04-4061PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

As part of an action in state court, Iomed, Inc. sought and obtained an ex parte order directing local police, with the assistance of Iomed, to execute a search of Jamal Yanaki’s residence. After the search was exécuted and various items seized, Yanaki and Susan Moss filed a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Iomed, several Iomed employees, lawyers for Iomed, and various other private actors. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges deprivations of their rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, infringement of their procedural and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Moss v. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. How v. City of Baxter SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API