Legal Opinion

Taylor v. McNichols

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2010No. 36130, 36131PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case comes before this Court on appeal from the grant of two Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Appellant, Reed Taylor alleges that the district court erred in denying his motions to amend his complaints, and erred in failing to properly apply the applicable standards in granting the motions to dismiss under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arises as a result of the separate case of Taylor v. AIA, et al., Nez Perce County Case No. CV07-00208…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Siercke v. SierckeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Berkshire Investments, LLC v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API