Legal Opinion
Hale v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1956PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Harrison Hale, from a judgment of the circuit court which was entered in favor of the defendants after the court had sustained a demurrer to the complaint and the plaintiff had declined to amend. The demurrer charged that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The proceeding was instituted under ORS 28.010 through 28.160, which, apart from two amendments, is the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act. Our Act’s departure from the Uniform Act occurs in §§ 2 and 11 of the Uniform Act, both of which were amended by Oregon Laws 1933, chapter 14. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HugeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Central Surety & Ins. Corporation v. CaswellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. District Court for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Gruber v. Lincoln Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- KNIGHT EX REL. ELLIS v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.