Legal Opinion

Ross v. Michigan Mutual Auto Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Docket No. 121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff was an automobile dealer residing at South Haven, Michigan, and owned a WillysKnight touring car which he had, on November 25, 1920, insured with defendant for a maximum amount of $1,000 against various kinds of loss, including “actual loss resulting by another automobile running into said automobile, not exceeding the total sum of $500.” On November 29, 1920, while he was driving this car upon a public highway “over near Riverside” with a passenger and attempting to pass a Ford truck going in the same direction a collision occurred between his car and a Cadillac hearse-automobile…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winckowski v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Joseph Earl Willmore v. Hertz Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Rembrandt, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Zabonick v. RalstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Beals v. Central Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API