Legal Opinion

Foreman Brothers Banking Co. v. Handy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1925No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On August 31, 1922, plaintiff commenced suit in assumpsit by summons issued out of the circuit court of Bay county against Thomas L. Handy and others. The writ was returnable October 18th and was not served on Thomas L. Handy. On the same day the principal suit was commenced, a writ of garnishment was issued against several garnishee defendants; it was served on them and they filed disclosures showing indebtedness in different amounts to Thomas L. Handy. On October 26th an alias writ in the principal suit was issued. Thomas L. Handy died October 23d. The Union Trust Company was appointed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McIlroy v. McIlroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Dow v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Myers v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Craig v. WagnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Hudson v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beals v. Central Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Swartz v. LaurencelleMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. First National Bank v. RohlikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Folkerts v. Marysville Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API