Legal Opinion

Exo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 36,541PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

John A. Hagerman was insured against liability in the amount of $5,000 for injuries to one person and $10,000 to two or more persons arising out of one accident by defendant Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange. On November 10,1929, his car collided with that of Neil Sandy, and severe injuries were sustained by Lena Sandy, Eleanor Sandy, William Exo, and Mrs. Exo, as well as himself. The car of Neil Sandy was also burned. Mrs. Exo and Hagerman both died as a result of the injuries. Defendant was immediately notified of the accident and sent its representative to investigate. Upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Realty Acceptance Corp. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Wisconsin Michigan Power Co. v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hoffman v. Security Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of EnsignMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Pietrantonio v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Weller v. CumminsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API