Belanger v. Teague
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
This appeal challenges an order of the Superior Court (Gray, J.) granting a motion for additur without extending the option of a new trial to the defendant.
Additur is customarily sought as alternative relief on a motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequate damages. Additur is “an order denying the plaintiffs application for a new trial on the condition that the defendant consent to an increase in the jury’s award as specified by the trial judge. The option of accepting an additur rests with [the] defendant . . . .” Bitting v. Willett, 47 N.J. 6, 9, 218 A.2d 859, 861…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Reid v. Spadone MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Hoague v. CotaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Wadsworth v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Bitting v. WillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aranson v. SchroederSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lee v. BallNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Breagy v. StarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Kravitz v. Beech Hill Hospital, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.