Legal Opinion

Belanger v. Teague

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 15, 1985No. 84-193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

This appeal challenges an order of the Superior Court (Gray, J.) granting a motion for additur without extending the option of a new trial to the defendant.

Additur is customarily sought as alternative relief on a motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequate damages. Additur is “an order denying the plaintiffs application for a new trial on the condition that the defendant consent to an increase in the jury’s award as specified by the trial judge. The option of accepting an additur rests with [the] defendant . . . .” Bitting v. Willett, 47 N.J. 6, 9, 218 A.2d 859, 861…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Reid v. Spadone MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Hoague v. CotaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Wadsworth v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  5. Bitting v. WillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aranson v. SchroederSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Lee v. BallNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Breagy v. StarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Kravitz v. Beech Hill Hospital, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API