Aranson v. Schroeder
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The Superior Court ([O’Neil, J.) has transferred, without ruling, the following three questions of law:
A. Does a cause of action exist against a person who allegedly created false material evidence while acting as defense counsel in a previous case and, after withdrawing as counsel, allegedly gave false testimony advancing such evidence?
B. If so, what are the elements of such a new cause of action?
C. Does such cause of action also exist against such counsel’s firm?
In addition, the trial court transferred two questions of law with ruling:
D. Did the Superior Court err in ruling that defendants…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Hill v. Town of ConwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.