Legal Opinion

Aranson v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1995No. Nos. 93-519; 93-527; 93-564PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The Superior Court ([O’Neil, J.) has transferred, without ruling, the following three questions of law:

A. Does a cause of action exist against a person who allegedly created false material evidence while acting as defense counsel in a previous case and, after withdrawing as counsel, allegedly gave false testimony advancing such evidence?

B. If so, what are the elements of such a new cause of action?

C. Does such cause of action also exist against such counsel’s firm?

In addition, the trial court transferred two questions of law with ruling:

D. Did the Superior Court err in ruling that defendants…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  3. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Hill v. Town of ConwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API