Legal Opinion
Fazio v. Brown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 27, 1988No. 13434PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This case is here as a result of our grant of certification from the Appellate Court. Fazio v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 289, 540 A.2d 1065, cert. granted, 208 Conn. 808, 545 A.2d 1103 (1988). In its decision, the Appellate Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the named plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict in this case as inadequate and that its action in doing so was not unconstitutional. The Appellate Court also determined that the trial court did not err by ordering a new trial limited solely to the issue of damages after the named plaintiff had…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- GAGLIANO v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Preston v. KeithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.