Legal Opinion

Bitting v. Willett

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 4, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division remanding plaintiff’s, Mrs. Bitting’s, automobile accident claim for a new trial as to damages only. The jury had returned a per quod verdict for plaintiff, Robert Bitting, in the sum of $5,000 and for plaintiff, Margaret Bitting, his wife, in the sum of $10,000. Upon plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial as to damages only, the trial court decided that unless defendant agreed to an additur of $2,500 to the verdict of $10,000 for Mrs. Bitting, a new trial would be granted. Defendant consented to the increase but plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bitting v. WillettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Fisch v. MangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Renee Cleaners, Inc. v. GOOD DEAL SUPER MARKETS OF NJ, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Landrigan v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Mulkerin v. Somerset Tire Service, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Tronolone v. PalmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Trentacost v. BrusselNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Law v. Newark Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API