Legal Opinion

Monohan v. Devinny

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaley, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Statute of Limitations has barred the plaintiff’s cause of action. Rules of Civil Practice, rule 107.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendants maintain an establishment in the city of Albany for the practice of chiropractic, which is an alleged method of curing maladies by the adjustment and manipulation of various parts of the body, and in particular the spinal column; that in October, 1924, plaintiff employed the defendants to render her twenty treatments for the sum of $30, and that the defendants undertook to render such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Nelson v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sly v. Van LengenNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hurlburt v. GillettNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Musser's v. ChaseOhio Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Isenstein v. MalcomsonNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rudman v. BancheriNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API