Legal Opinion

Hurlburt v. Gillett

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Demurrer to separate "defense.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for defendant’s alleged unskillfulness or improper performance of services as a dentist in treating plaintiff. Defendant pleads the Statute of Limitations which he avers “ requires that an action to recover damages for malpractice must be commenced within two years after the cause of action has accrued, and that this action was not begun within two years from the date when the cause of action is alleged to have accrued.” To this defense plaintiff demurs for insufficiency. Plaintiff urges that his action is for breach of contract, and that the six-year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. McCracken v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Roark v. GreenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Mernin v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. In re BaumNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Milde v. LeighNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Sly v. Van LengenNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Monahan v. DevinnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API