Legal Opinion

Sly v. Van Lengen

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

Defendant moves, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment dismissing the complaint, upon the ground that the cause of action set forth in that pleading did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.

The defendant is a physician residing in the city of Syracuse. The plaintiff, one of his patients, brings this action to recover damages for his alleged malpractice. In order to recover she must have commenced this action within two years after the cause of action accrued. Civil Practice Act, § 50; Hurlburt v. Gillett, 96 Misc. Rep.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurlburt v. GillettNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API