Legal Opinion

Isenstein v. Malcomson

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

This motion squarely presents the question whether a registered nurse, charged with treating a patient “in so careless, reckless, incompetent, negligent and unskillful a manner as to cause the plaintiff the injuries,” is entitled to take advantage of the two-year Statute of Limitations provided in subdivision 1 of section 50 of the Civil Practice Act, in case of malpractice, or is relegated to the three-year period prescribed by subdivision 6 of section 49 of the same act in an action to recover damages for a personal injury resulting from negligence. We have not been referred to any decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monahan v. DevinnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Monohan v. DevinnyNew York Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rudman v. BancheriNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API