Legal Opinion

Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 1975No. 45413PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment granted defendants and from an order denying their own motions for summary judgment 1 in this action to recover damages arising out of the alleged unauthorized practice of law by defendant bank with respect to the drafting of certain trust instruments. The evidence upon which the cross-motions for summary judgment were submitted is essentially undisputed.

Raymond H. Dart, creator of the trust involved in this action, though blind from childhood, was an attorney practicing in Litchfield, Minnesota, from 1909 to 1955. He also served as…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brammer v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Scott v. Independent School District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Terry J. Kolb v. Scherer Brothers Financial Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API