Legal Opinion
Leek v. American Express Property Casualty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1999No. C7-98-1911PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge
Appellant American Express Property Casualty challenges the district court’s dismissal of an action to vacate a no-fault arbitration award for lack of jurisdiction due to improper service. American Express argues that under Minn. R. No-Fault Arb. 29 a party may initiate an action in district court without complying with Minn. R. Civ. P. 4. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Mary Leek sought no-fault benefits from American Express arising from two 1996 automobile accidents. After termination of benefits, Leek petitioned for mandatory no-fault arbitration pursuant to Minn. Stat.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Coons v. St. Paul CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc. v. NashNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Hughes v. LundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.